Human Impact and Pressures

African development corridors and their impact on PAs

Manager — Thu, 16 Feb 2023 07:51:26 +0000

African development corridors and their impact on PAs

Manager Thu, 02/16/2023 - 08:51

The African Development Corridors is the first comprehensive database of 79 ongoing and planned investment corridors across Africa, synthesizing data from multiple sources covering 184 projects on railways, wet and dry ports, pipelines, airports, techno-cities, and industrial parks.It was published by Thorn, J.P.R., Bignoli, D.J., Mwangi, B. et al. The African Development Corridors Database: a new tool to assess the impacts of infrastructure investments. Sci Data 9, 679 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01771-y have been buffered according to the level of intervention (Major road: 15 km, Passenger and freight railway: 10 km, Railway: 5 km, Pipeline: 2,5km). Data obtained was intersected with the country boundaries and with protected areas (WDPA, February 2023 version) obtaining the percentage of PA coverage of corridors in each country.

Technical Reference/Fact Sheet

africa-knowledge-platform.ec.europa.eu

Ranking

off

Make Map Points

Off

State

natural areas, landscape, ecosystems

natural dynamics

transport

urban environment, urban stress

Pressure

Transportation & service corridors

Add Map Layers

African development corridors and their impact on PAs

{ "id": "geonode:Corridors_prot_unprot_country_perc_num_pas", "type": "raster", "source": { "type": "raster", "tiles": [ "https://geonode-rris.biopama.org/geoserver/geonode/wms?bbox={bbox-epsg-3857}&service=WMS&request=GetMap&layers=geonode:Corridors_prot_unprot_country_perc_num_pas&format=image%2Fpng&transparent=true&version=1.1.1&height=256&width=256&srs=EPSG%3A3857" ], "tileSize": 256 }, "paint": {} }

https://geonode-rris.biopama.org/geoserver/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image/png&WIDTH=20&HEIGHT=20&LAYER=geonode:Corridors_prot_unprot_country_perc_num_pas&STYLE=Corridors_prot_unprot_country_perc_num_pas&version=1.3.0&sld_version=1.1

Global Data

African development corridors protection levels

The African Development Corridors published by Thorn, J.P.R., Bignoli, D.J., Mwangi, B. et al. The African Development Corridors Database: a new tool to assess the impacts of infrastructure investments. Sci Data 9, 679 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01771-y have been buffered according to the level of intervention (Major road: 15 km, Passenger and freight railway: 10 km, Railway: 5 km, Pipeline: 2,5km). Data obtained was intersected with the country boundaries and with protected areas (WDPA, February 2023 version) obtaining the percentage of PA coverage of corridors in each country.

https://geonode-rris.biopama.org/geoserver/geonode/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=geonode:prot_corridors&PROPERTYNAME=country_na,iso3,perc,&outputFormat=application/json

iso3

{"name":"Country ", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 20, "type":"category", "data":"country_na"}

{"name":"Protection (%) ", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 60, "type":"value", "data":"perc"}

{"name":"Protection (%) ", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Protection (%) ", "data":"perc"}

Descending

Yes

BIOPAMA Geonode

features

https://geonode-rris.biopama.org/geoserver/geonode/wms?

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

diverging-1

Topic

Human Impact and Pressures

Agricultural Pressure Indicator (API)

andrew2 — Thu, 08 Nov 2018 12:56:35 +0000

Agricultural Pressure Indicator (API)

andrew2 Thu, 11/08/2018 - 13:56

How much potential impact may agriculture land use in a protected area have on the habitats, species and ecological processes therein? By identifying protected areas with low pressure from agriculture, it is possible to highlight locations that are likely to better conserve the ecosystems, species and ecological processes that are associated to more pristine conditions and that are more sensitive to the direct and indirect impacts from this form of human land use. On the other hand, by identifying protected areas with a relatively high percentage of cropland, it is possible to suggest in which locations it is a priority to implement measures that enhance the compatibility of crop production with biodiversity conservation. These measures may include promoting less intensive agricultural practices or retaining natural vegetation remnants within and between crops, which may contribute to provide habitat resources and to facilitate the movement of species across otherwise impermeable landscapes.

Indicator unit: The API assesses the percentage of the surface of a protected area that is covered by cropland.

Area of interest: API has been calculated for all protected areas, countries for each terrestrial protected area of size ≥ 1 km2 and for the terrestrial parts of each coastal protected area of size ≥ 1 km2 as well as their 10 km unprotected buffer zone (for buffers, values are computed and reported only for protected areas of size ≥ 5 km2 ). We further show trends regarding the percentage of agricultural land at the country level.

---

Data Uploaded by Luca Battistella using the Digital Observatory for Protected Areas Services (2022)

ATG

BHS

BRB

BLZ

CUB

DMA

DOM

GRD

GUY

HTI

JAM

KNA

LCA

VCT

SUR

TTO

COK

FJI

KIR

MHL

FSM

NRU

NIU

PLW

PNG

WSM

SLB

TLS

TON

TUV

VUT

BEN

BFA

BDI

CMR

CPV

CAF

TCD

COG

CIV

COD

GNQ

GAB

GMB

GHA

GIN

GNB

LBR

MLI

MRT

NGA

STP

SEN

SLE

TGO

AGO

BWA

COM

DJI

ERI

ETH

KEN

LSO

MDG

MWI

MUS

MOZ

NAM

RWA

SYC

SOM

ZAF

SSD

SDN

SWZ

UGA

TZA

ZMB

ZWE

Technical Reference/Fact Sheet

DOPA Factsheet

Source

Source:

Ranking

off

Make Map Points

Off

Pressure

Agriculture & aquaculture

National Data

DOPA Agricultural Pressure Indicator (API)

Use and interpretation: This indicator can be used to assess the potential impact that agriculture may have on the biodiversity and ecological integrity of a protected area. There are several reasons why agricultural land use in a protected area may be of concern and lead to negative outcomes for the conservation of many of the habitats, species and ecological processes therein (see e.g. Green et al., 2005; Balmford, Green & Phalan, 2012; Cai & Pettenella, 2013). First, agriculture expansion is one of the main drivers of deforestation and habitat loss worldwide. Second, the input of pesticides and fertilizers may decrease habitat quality and cause declines in population sizes for many species, even at significant distances from the croplands. Third, agricultural activities such as tillage may affect soil structure and biodiversity. Fourth, agricultural land use can favor the abundance of more generalist, cosmopolitan species in the detriment of the specialist species that are associated to largely undisturbed habitats, which are usually those species of higher conservation concern, as well as promote the spread of invasive alien species. Although the API does not separately evaluate each of these pressures or potential effects, it provides a general assessment of the potential combined magnitude of all these impacts that may be associated to agricultural land use in a protected area.

https://dopa-services.jrc.ec.europa.eu/services/d6dopa/dopa_41/get_de_country_pa_stats?format=json&c_un_m49=NUM

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area (WDPA ID)", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 20, "type":"category", "data":"pa_name"}

{"name":"Percentage of PA area", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 60, "type":"value", "data":"ap"}

{"name":"Percentage of PA area covered by cropland", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Percentage of PA area covered by cropland", "data":"ap"}

Ascending

REST

un_m49

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

Topic

Human Impact and Pressures

Change in Population Pressure Indicator (CPPI)

andrew2 — Thu, 08 Nov 2018 12:31:02 +0000

Change in Population Pressure Indicator (CPPI)

andrew2 Thu, 11/08/2018 - 13:31

How much potential impact may humans living in a protected area have on that protected area and on the habitats, species and ecological processes therein? How much of this potential impact is due to recent (15-year) increases in human population density? By identifying protected areas with low population density, it is possible to highlight locations that are likely to better conserve the species and ecological processes that are associated to more pristine conditions and that are more sensitive to the direct and indirect impacts from human activities. On the other hand, by identifying protected areas with a relatively high or increasing population density, it is possible to suggest in which locations it is likely most necessary to ensure an effective management of the human-nature relationships and the sustainability of human activities. In these locations, a priority would be to orient human activities and livelihoods in ways that are compatible with the conservation targets, such as ecotourism and other regulated recreation activities, or supporting traditional modes of rural development that have been compatible with the persistence of the biodiversity values of the protected area.

Indicator unit: The PPI assesses human population density for a given area in year 2015, expressed as the average number of people per km2 . The CPPI assesses the percent change in human population density for the same area from 2000 to 2015.

Area of interest: PPI and CPPI have been calculated for each terrestrial protected area and for the terrestrial parts of each coastal protected areas. To assess pressures around protected areas, we further computed the indicators for the 10 km unprotected buffer zone around the protected areas of size ≥ 5 km2 . PPI and CPPI are reported in DOPA Explorer for each terrestrial and coastal protected area of size ≥ 1 km2 and their unprotected buffers (values for buffers are reported only for protected areas of size ≥ 5 km2 ). We further show trends regarding the changes in rural and urban population at the country level.

---

Data Uploaded by Luca Battistella using the Digital Observatory for Protected Areas Services (2022)

ATG

BHS

BRB

BLZ

CUB

DMA

DOM

GRD

GUY

HTI

JAM

KNA

LCA

VCT

SUR

TTO

COK

FJI

KIR

MHL

FSM

NRU

NIU

PLW

PNG

WSM

SLB

TLS

TON

TUV

VUT

BEN

BFA

BDI

CMR

CPV

CAF

TCD

COG

CIV

COD

GNQ

GAB

GMB

GHA

GIN

GNB

LBR

MLI

MRT

NGA

STP

SEN

SLE

TGO

AGO

BWA

COM

DJI

ERI

ETH

KEN

LSO

MDG

MWI

MUS

MOZ

NAM

RWA

SYC

SOM

ZAF

SSD

SDN

SWZ

UGA

TZA

ZMB

ZWE

Technical Reference/Fact Sheet

DOPA Factsheet

Source

Source:

Ranking

off

Make Map Points

Off

Pressure

Human intrusions & disturbance

National Data

DOPA Change in Population Pressure Indicator

PPI can be used to assess the relative potential impact that human population may have on the biodiversity and ecological integrity of a protected area, while CPPI is useful as a proxy of the changes in the potential impacts of human population in a protected area over the last 15 years. Because about 40% of the world’s population lives within 100 kilometers of the coast, a figure that is constantly increasing, this indicator is particularly useful to assess pressures on coastal protected areas. There are several reasons why a high or increasing human population density in a protected area may be of concern and lead to negative outcomes for the conservation of the habitats, species and ecological processes therein (see e.g. Mcdonald et al., 2009; Güneralp & Seto, 2013). First, human activities may increase pollution, noise and light disturbance in marine and terrestrial protected areas. Second, human settlements and built-up areas may cause, by themselves, some habitat loss and degradation, as well as trigger additional unregulated land cover and land use changes or extractive activities within the protected area. Third, human presence in the protected area may in some cases, if not properly regulated, directly reduce wildlife populations through poaching and overfishing. Fourth, some species may avoid or be found at lower abundances near human settlements, as related to the impacts just mentioned. Fifth, a higher human population density may increase the number and the spread rates of invasive species, including new diseases to which native species may have no or may only have a weak immunity response, as well as of disturbances like forest fires. Even if no invasions of alien species occur, humans may also indirectly favor the abundance of more generalist, cosmopolitan species in detriment of the specialist species that are associated to largely undisturbed habitats, which are usually those species of higher conservation concern. Although the PPI and CPPI do not separately evaluate each of these pressures or potential effects, they provide a general assessment of the potential combined magnitude of all these impacts that may be associated to human populations living in a protected area. These impacts are exacerbated in protected areas with poor management, enforcement or institutional support, and are likely to be significantly lower in effectively managed protected areas in which the impacts of humans on biodiversity and ecosystems are minimized through appropriate regulation and support to the activities, such as traditional ones, that are compatible with the conservation objectives. Protected areas can in many cases, if they are well managed, supported and funded, provide opportunities for enhancing the livelihoods of local communities, promoting job creation and reducing poverty, as well as help to maintain the ecosystem services on which many communities depend, thereby contributing both to biodiversity conservation and to the long-term sustainability of human activities in and around protected areas (Scherl et al., 2004; EU 2015). For further discussions on population growth near protected areas, we also refer to Wittemyer et al. (2008) and Joppa, Loarie & Pimm (2009) who obtain contradicting conclusions.

https://dopa-services.jrc.ec.europa.eu/services/d6dopa/dopa_41/get_de_country_pa_stats?format=json&c_un_m49=NUM

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area (WDPA ID)", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 20, "type":"category", "data":"pa_name"}

{"name":"Percent change", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 60, "type":"value", "data":"ppi_change"}

{"name":"Percent change in human population density 2000-2015", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Percent change in human population density 2000-2015", "data":"ppi_change"}

Ascending

REST

Topic

Human Impact and Pressures

Country extinction-risk footprints

SimonaLippi — Tue, 07 Jun 2022 14:09:45 +0000

Country extinction-risk footprints

SimonaLippi Tue, 06/07/2022 - 16:09

A new study quantified how the consumption habits of people in each country, through trade and supply networks, imperil threatened and near-threatened terrestrial species of amphibians, mammals and birds. For the study, recently published in Scientific Reports, researchers used a metric called the extinction-risk footprint. The team found that 76 countries are net “importers” of this footprint, meaning they drive demand for products that contribute to the decline of endangered species abroad. Other countries, e.g. Madagascar, Tanzania, are designated as net “exporters,” meaning their extinction-risk footprint is driven more by consumption habits in other countries. In several countries domestic consumption is the most significant driver of extinction risk within those nations. Learn more: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-09827-0

This sub-dataset provides detail on each country's extinction-risk footprint. A global level, the map shows the impact of global consumption on the species found within that country’s borders in percentage. A national level, the map shows the imported and exported consumption for each country. The imported extinction-risk footprint is a result of consumption within the country driving extinction risk in other countries, and its exported extinction risk footprint is a result of consumption outside of the country driving the extinction risk within the country.

Uploaded by Simona Lippi (Using BIOPAMA GEONODE)

Response (Policies and Goals/Targets)

Goal B

Technical Reference/Fact Sheet

Source:Irwin, A., Geschke, A., Brooks, T.M. et al. Quantifying and categorising…

Ranking

off

Make Map Points

Off

Pressure

Human intrusions & disturbance

Global Data

National extinction-risk footprints

https://geonode-rris.biopama.org/geoserver/geonode/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=geonode:footprint_risk&PROPERTYNAME=isoa3_id,terr_foot,&outputFormat=application/json

isoa3_id

iso3

{"name":"Country", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 20, "type":"category", "data":"isoa3_id"}

{"name":"Territorial footprint as % of global total", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 60, "type":"value", "data":"terr_foot"}

{"name":"Territorial footprint as % of global total", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Territorial footprint as % of global total", "data":"terr_foot"}

Descending

External Map Data

features

https://geonode-rris.biopama.org/geoserver/geonode/wms?

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

sequential-8

National Data

Countries ‘Import’ and ‘Export’ Extinction Risk

A national level, the map shows the imported and exported consumption for each country. The imported extinction-risk footprint is a result of consumption within the country driving extinction risk in other countries, and its exported extinction risk footprint is a result of consumption outside of the country driving the extinction risk within the country.

isoa3_id

iso3

{"name":"Country", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 20, "type":"category", "data":"isoa3_id"}

{"name":"% Consumption footprint imported", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 60, "type":"value", "data":"foot_impor"}

{"name":"% Consumption footprint imported", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"% Consumption footprint imported", "data":"foot_impor"}

{"name":"% Territorial footprint exported", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"% Territorial footprint exported", "data":"foot_expor"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geonode-rris.biopama.org/geoserver/geonode/wms?

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

sequential-6

Topic

Human Impact and Pressures

Human pressure potential index in PAs

claudiacap — Tue, 06 Apr 2021 09:24:58 +0000

Human pressure potential index in PAs claudiacap Tue, 04/06/2021 - 11:24

Indicator of potential human pressure in and around protected areas derived from indices of forest loss, population and agriculture pressures (DOPA 4.0).

This indicator is a proxi for potential human activities pressure inside and in a 10km-buffer around protected areas. Therefore it may indicate potential vulnerability in conditions whereby protected area financial resources, local economy and supply chains are disrupted by national and/or international crises, and so coping and adaptation strategies may consist in an increased pressure from human activities on natural resources.

It is a component of the vulnerablity indicator to gloabl tourism and travel crisis.

Response (Policies and Goals/Targets)

Identify good agricultural land

Ranking

off

Make Map Points

Off

Pressure

Human intrusions & disturbance

National Data

Human pressure index in PAs

Indicator of potential human pressure in and around protected areas derived from indices of forest loss, population and agriculture pressures (DOPA 4.0). The composite indicator was calulcated as the mean value of four standardised indices of forest loss, population change (1995-2015), population density and agriculture coverage.

It is a component of the vulnerablity composite indicator to global tourism and travel crisis.

https://api.biopama.org/api/vulnerability/function/api_vuln_pa_country/iso3=ISO3

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected areas", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 20, "type":"category", "data":"wdpaid"}

{"name":"Human Pressure index", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 60, "type":"value", "data":"humpressure_ind"}

{"name":"Pressure index", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Pressure index", "data":"humpressure_ind"}

Descending

Yes

REST

Standard Deviation

diverging-1

Topic

Human Impact and Pressures

Oil Palm Extent

Manager — Tue, 23 Mar 2021 13:23:08 +0000

Oil Palm Extent

Manager Tue, 03/23/2021 - 14:23

Industrial and smallholder oil palm plantation data.

Oil seed crops, especially oil palm, are among the most rapidly expanding agricultural land uses, and their expansion is known to cause significant environmental damage. Accordingly, these crops often feature in public and policy debates, which are hampered or biased by a lack of accurate information on environmental impacts. This dataset presents a global crop map. It covers areas where oil palm plantations were detected at global scale, and includes industrial and smallholder mature oil palm plantations.

Adrià, Descals, Serge, Wich, Erik, Meijaard, David, Gaveau, Stephen, Peedell, & Zoltan, Szantoi. (2020). High resolution global industrial and smallholder oil palm map for 2019 (Version v0) [Data set]. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3884602

Analysis performed by L. Battistella in July 2020.

---

Data Uploaded by Luca Battistella using BIOPAMA Services (2022)

Response (Policies and Goals/Targets)

Aichi Target 05 on Natural Habitats

Ranking

off

Make Map Points

Off

State

agriculture

Pressure

Agriculture & aquaculture

Add Map Layers

Oil palm Extent

{ "id": "oilpalm:oilpalm", "type": "raster", "source": { "type": "raster", "tiles": [ "https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/africa_platform/wms?bbox={bbox-epsg-3857}&service=WMS&request=GetMap&layers=oilpalm:oilpalm&format=image%2Fpng&transparent=true&version=1.1.1&height=256&width=256&srs=EPSG%3A3857" ], "tileSize": 256 }, "paint": {} }

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/wms?REQUEST=GetLegendGraphic&VERSION=1.0.0&FORMAT=image/png&WIDTH=20&HEIGHT=20&LAYER=oilpalm:oilpalm

Global Data

Industrial and smallholder oil palm plantation data

Industrial and smallholder oil palm plantation data.

Analysis performed by L. Battistella in July 2020.

https://api.biopama.org/api/oilpalm/function/api_country

iso3

{"name":"Country ", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 20, "type":"category", "data":"Iso3"}

{"name":"Oil palm plantation (sqkm)", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 60, "type":"value", "data":"v1_area_sqkm"}

{"name":"Industrial mature oil palm plantation (sqkm)", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Industrial mature oil palm plantation (sqkm)", "data":"v1_area_sqkm"}

{"name":"Smallholder mature oil palm plantation (sqkm)", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Smallholder mature oil palm plantation (sqkm)", "data":"v2_area_sqkm"}

Descending

REST

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

sequential-1

PA Data

Oil palm Extent in Protected Areas

Industrial and smallholder oil palm plantation data in Protected Areas

Analysis performed by L. Battistella in July 2020.

https://api.biopama.org/api/oilpalm/function/api_pa/wdpaid=WDPAID

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"PA", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 20, "type":"category", "data":"wdpaid"}

{"name":"Oil palm plantation (sqkm)", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 60, "type":"value", "data":"v1_area_sqkm"}

{"name":"Industrial mature oil palm plantation (sqkm)", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Industrial mature oil palm plantation (sqkm)", "data":"v1_area_sqkm"}

{"name":"Smallholder mature oil palm plantation (sqkm)", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Smallholder mature oil palm plantation (sqkm)", "data":"v2_area_sqkm"}

Descending

REST

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

sequential-1

National Data

Oil palm Extent in Protected Areas

Industrial and smallholder oil palm plantation data in Protected Areas.

Analysis performed by L. Battistella in July 2020.

https://api.biopama.org/api/oilpalm/function/api_pa_country/iso3=ISO3

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"PAs", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 20, "type":"category", "data":"wdpaid"}

{"name":"Oil palm plantation (% of protected area)", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 60, "type":"value", "data":"v1_perc"}

{"name":"Industrial mature oil palm plantation (% of protected area)", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Industrial mature oil palm plantation (% of protected area)", "data":"v1_perc"}

{"name":"Smallholder mature oil palm plantation (% of protected area)", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Smallholder mature oil palm plantation (% of protected area)", "data":"v2_perc"}

Descending

REST

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

sequential-1

Topic

Human Impact and Pressures

Palm oil plantations-Small holdings

claudiacap — Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:56:01 +0000

Palm oil plantations-Small holdings

claudiacap Wed, 09/30/2020 - 16:56

---

Data Uploaded by Luca Battistella using BIOPAMA Services (2021)

Source

Source:

Ranking

off

Make Map Points

Off

Pressure

Agriculture & aquaculture

Global Data

Palm oil small holdings surface

Palm oil small holdings surface (sqkm)

https://api.biopama.org/api/oilpalm/function/api_country?fields=iso3,v2_area_sqkm

iso3

{"name":"Country", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 20, "type":"category", "data":"iso3"}

{"name":"Area_sqkm", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 60, "type":"value", "data":"v2_area_sqkm"}

{"name":"Area_sqkm", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Area_sqkm", "data":"v2_area_sqkm"}

Descending

REST

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

sequential-1

Topic

Human Impact and Pressures

Population Pressure Indicator (PPI)

andrew2 — Thu, 08 Nov 2018 12:25:14 +0000

Population Pressure Indicator (PPI)

andrew2 Thu, 11/08/2018 - 13:25

---

Data Uploaded by Luca Battistella using the Digital Observatory for Protected Areas Services (2022)

ATG

BHS

BRB

BLZ

CUB

DMA

DOM

GRD

GUY

HTI

JAM

KNA

LCA

VCT

SUR

TTO

COK

FJI

KIR

MHL

FSM

NRU

NIU

PLW

PNG

WSM

SLB

TLS

TON

TUV

VUT

BEN

BFA

BDI

CMR

CPV

CAF

TCD

COG

CIV

COD

GNQ

GAB

GMB

GHA

GIN

GNB

LBR

MLI

MRT

NGA

STP

SEN

SLE

TGO

AGO

BWA

COM

DJI

ERI

ETH

KEN

LSO

MDG

MWI

MUS

MOZ

NAM

RWA

SYC

SOM

ZAF

SSD

SDN

SWZ

UGA

TZA

ZMB

ZWE

Technical Reference/Fact Sheet

DOPA Factsheet

Source

Source:

Ranking

off

Make Map Points

Off

Pressure

Human intrusions & disturbance

Add Map Layers

Population 2015

{ "id": "ghsl_population_15", "type": "raster", "source": { "type": "raster", "tiles": [ "https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/dopa_explorer_3/wms?bbox={bbox-epsg-3857}&service=WMS&request=GetMap&layers=ghsl_population_15&format=image%2Fpng&transparent=true&version=1.1.1&height=256&width=256&srs=EPSG%3A3857" ], "tileSize": 256 }, "paint": {} }

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/dopa_explorer_3/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=ghsl_population_15

National Data

DOPA Population Pressure Indicator

PPI

https://dopa-services.jrc.ec.europa.eu/services/d6dopa/dopa_41/get_de_country_pa_stats?format=json&c_un_m49=NUM

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area (WDPA ID)", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 20, "type":"category", "data":"pa_name"}

{"name":"Average number of people per km2", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 60, "type":"value", "data":"ppi"}

{"name":"Average number of people per km2", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Average number of people per km2", "data":"ppi"}

Ascending

REST

un_m49

Topic

Human Impact and Pressures

Proportion of total land area that is under cultivation

SimonaLippi — Thu, 25 May 2023 17:53:22 +0000

Proportion of total land area that is under cultivation

SimonaLippi Thu, 05/25/2023 - 19:53

Cropland is land used for the cultivation of crops. Land change from natural/semi natural ecosystems to agriculture is a major driver of biodiversity loss and land degradation. Efficient land use and land management plans and strategies are needed to maximize crop productivity while minimizing the potential environmental impact due to excessive loss of habitats and overuse of natural resources such as soils and water

Source dataset: Zanaga, D., Van De Kerchove, R., De Keersmaecker, W., Souverijns, N., Brockmann, C., Quast, R., Wevers, J., Grosu, A., Paccini, A., Vergnaud, S., Cartus, O., Santoro, M., Fritz, S., Georgieva, I., Lesiv, M., Carter, S., Herold, M., Li, Linlin, Tsendbazar, N.E., Ramoino, F., Arino, O., 2021. ESA WorldCover 10 m 2020 v100.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5571936

Response (Policies and Goals/Targets)

Target 01

Ranking

off

Make Map Points

Off

Global Data

Proportion of total land area that is under cultivation

https://api.biopama.org/api/land_use_land_change/function/api_cropland_country_perc

iso3

{"name":"Country", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 20, "type":"category", "data":"iso3"}

{"name":"percentage of cropland over total area", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 60, "type":"value", "data":"perc_crop"}

{"name":"percentage of cropland over total area", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"percentage of cropland over total area", "data":"perc_crop"}

Descending

REST

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

National Data

Proportion of protected area that is under cultivation

https://api.biopama.org/api/land_use_land_change/function/api_cropland_pa_perc/isoa3_id=ISO3

isoa3_id

iso3

{"name":"Country", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 20, "type":"category", "data":"isoa3_id"}

{"name":"percentage of cropland over protected area", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 60, "type":"value", "data":"perc"}

{"name":"percentage of cropland over protected area", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"percentage of cropland over protected area", "data":"perc"}

Descending

REST

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

Topic

Human Impact and Pressures

What is the conservation status of the fish stocks?

SimonaLippi — Tue, 19 Apr 2022 19:13:41 +0000

What is the conservation status of the fish stocks?

SimonaLippi Tue, 04/19/2022 - 21:13

A fundamental requirement for productive fisheries is maintenance of the biodiversity that offers natural systems resilience against changing conditions.(FAO, State of World Fishery and Aquaculture 2020). Threatened marine fish species can be legally caught in industrial fisheries and moreover according to FAO, annual estimate of fisheries interactions with at least 20 million individuals of endangered, threatened and/or protected species. Here we show the catch records (tonnes) of globally threatened species in the EEZ by country in the last 10 years.

---

Data Uploaded by Simona Lippi using BIOPAMA Services (2022)

Response (Policies and Goals/Targets)

14.4 By 2020, effectively regulate harvesting and end overfishing

Target 09

Ranking

off

Make Map Points

Off

State

fishery

Pressure

Human intrusions & disturbance

Global Data

What is the conservation status of the fish stocks?

https://geonode-rris.biopama.org/geoserver/geonode/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=geonode:wild_threat_catch0&PROPERTYNAME=isoa3_id,tot_catch,tot_threat,&outputFormat=application/json

isoa3_id

iso3

{"name":"country", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 20, "type":"category", "data":"isoa3_id"}

{"name":"sum of threatened fish catch in tonnes", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 60, "type":"value", "data":"tot_threat"}

{"name":"Total sum threatened fish catch in tonnes", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Total sum threatened fish catch in tonnes", "data":"tot_threat"}

{"name":"total sum fish catch in tonnes", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"total sum fish catch in tonnes", "data":"tot_catch"}

Descending

Yes

External Map Data

features

https://geonode-rris.biopama.org/geoserver/geonode/wms?

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

diverging-2

Topic

Human Impact and Pressures