Résumé analytique 

The Global Database on Protected Area Management Effectiveness (

Citation: Osipova, E., Shi, Y., Kormos, C., Shadie, P., Zwahlen. C., Badman, T. (2014).

Citation: Osipova, E., Shadie, P., Zwahlen, C., Osti, M., Shi, Y., Kormos, C., Bertzky, B., Murai, M., Van Merm, R., Badman, T. (2017).

Citation: Osipova, E., Emslie-Smith, M., Osti, M., Murai, M., Åberg, U., Shadie, P. (2020). IUCN World Heritage Outlook 3: A conservation assessment of all natural World Heritage sites.

Citation: Leverington F. et al. (2010) Management effectiveness evaluation in protected areas – a global study. Second edition. The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Citation: Leverington F. et al. (2008) Management effectiveness evaluation in protected areas – a global study. The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Citation: Leverington F. et al. (2008) Management effectiveness evaluation in protected areas – a global study: Overview of approaches and methodologies.

Protected Planet is the authoritative source of data on protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs).

The Protected Planet Report 2018 provides an update of progress towards Aichi Biodiversity Target 11 at the global scale. With two years to go until 2020, the Protected Planet Report 2018 confirms

The Protected Planet Report 2020 edition provides the final report on the status of Aichi Biodiversity Target 11, and looks to the future as the world prepares to adopt a new global targets for nat